False positives

How to identify false positives?

1. Misconfigurations: Sometimes, security scanners may flag misconfigurations as vulnerabilities. Check the configuration settings manually to confirm whether the reported issue is a false positive.
2. Custom Code and Business Logic: Automated scanners may not fully understand the custom code and business logic of an application. False positives can occur if the scanner misinterprets the intended behavior. Manual testing and code review are essential for identifying these issues.
3. Input Validation Bypass: Scanners often test for generic vulnerabilities like SQL injection or cross-site scripting by injecting payloads into user input fields. However, if the application uses strong input validation and sanitation mechanisms, false positives may be triggered. Review the scanner results in the context of the application's input validation mechanisms.
4. Authentication Mechanisms: False positives may be reported when the scanner encounters login pages or authentication mechanisms. It may interpret these as vulnerabilities when they are actually part of the normal application behavior. Adjust the scanner settings to handle authentication properly or exclude certain paths from scanning.
5. Dynamic Content: Web applications with dynamic content or JavaScript-based interactions may confuse scanners, leading to false positives. Manual inspection of the application's behavior during scanning can help identify whether reported vulnerabilities are legitimate.
6. Outdated Information: Security scanners rely on vulnerability databases, and if the information is outdated, false positives may occur. Ensure that the scanner is using the latest vulnerability signatures and databases.

How to address false positives effectively

• Manual Verification: Manually verify each reported vulnerability to confirm its validity. This involves inspecting the affected code, configuration, or behavior to determine if there is an actual security issue.
• Customize Scanner Settings: Adjust the scanner settings to better suit the specifics of the web application. This may include configuring authentication, excluding certain paths, or tuning the scanner for the application's technology stack.
• Regular Updates: Keep the vulnerability scanner and its signatures up to date to ensure that it has the latest information about known vulnerabilities.
• Collaboration: Foster collaboration between security professionals and developers to understand the application's logic and behavior better. This collaboration can help in accurately interpreting scan results and distinguishing false positives from real vulnerabilities.

By combining automated scanning with manual verification and collaboration, you can minimize the occurrence of false positives and improve the overall accuracy of your web application security assessments.

Aikido’s vulnerability scanner automatically triages false positives. Get alerted only when it matters. Try it out for free.