Welcome to our blog.

SQL injection (SQLi) has a history that is older than Internet Explorer (which according to Gen Z was the start of civilization). There have been thousands of breaches caused by SQL injection and an endless amount of well-documented best practices and tools to help prevent it. So surely, surely we learned our lesson from these breaches and SQLi is no longer an issue.

We have been monitoring the number of SQL injections discovered in open-source and closed-source projects to see if we are getting better. With the recent news coming that stolen data from the MOVEit SQL injection breach is bring sold for companies like Amazon, we decided to give you a sneak peek into our up-and-coming State of Injection report for 2025.

Spoiler, turns out we are still terrible at preventing SQL injection.

What is SQL injection?

SQLi is a vulnerability that occurs when a program uses untrusted user input directly in a query to a SQL database. A malicious user can then insert their own code and manipulate the query allowing the malicious user to access private data, bypass authentication or delete data. The example below shows how an insecure SQL query for a user login page is vulnerable to an SQLi authentication bypass attack.

There are many different types of injection attacks like code injection or cross-site scripting (XSS). But SQLi specifically has played a prominent role in breaches for a very long time and comes as a shock to many that we still need to discuss this in 2024.

How an SQLi attack happens

1. Vulnerable query
Example of a vulnerable query where user input is directly used in the query

2. SQL injection attack
SQL is injected into the user input field of an authentication page

3. Query run with payload
Payload comments out the password check so the query ignores this step

SQL injection by the numbers:

• 6.7% of all vulnerabilities found in open-source projects are SQLi
• 10% for closed-source projects!
• An increase in the total number of SQL injection in open-source projects (CVE’s that involve SQLi) from 2264 (2023) to 2400 (2024) is expected.
• As a percentage of all vulnerabilities, SQL injection is getting less popular: a decrease of 14% and 17% for open-source and closed-source projects respectively from 2023 to 2024
• Over 20% of closed source projects scanned are vulnerable to SQL injection when they first start using security tooling
• For organizations vulnerable to SQL injection, the average number of SQL injection sites is nearly 30 separate locations in the code

We reviewed how many SQLi vulnerabilities were discovered in open-source packages in 2023 and so far in 2024. We then compared that to closed-source projects that have been discovered by Aikido Security. Unsurprisingly, we are still seeing shocking numbers of SQL injection in both closed and open-source projects. 6.7% of all vulnerabilities discovered in open-source projects in 2024 are SQL injection vulnerabilities while 10% of vulnerabilities discovered in closed-source projects were SQL injection vulnerabilities. This may not seem like a lot but it is frankly shocking that in 2024 we are still struggling to cope with some of the most basic vulnerabilities we know of.

The only good news we have is that this number is a 14% decrease from 2023 in open-source and a 17% reduction in closed-source projects as a percentage of all vulnerabilities found. However, the total number of SQLi found is expected in increase from 2264 in 2023 to over 2400 by the end of 2024 in open-source projects.

Preventing SQL injection

Apparently, there isn’t enough information on the internet just yet on how to prevent SQL injection so here is an overview of the options available in 2025:

1. Use Prepared Statements and Parameterized Queries

In the example at the start of this Blog Post, we showed vulnerable code because it takes untrusted user input and uses it directly in a query. To avoid this we should use prepared statements which means defining your query first and then adding user input later. This separates the command and data stream, fixing the problem completely. A great solution, but not always possible or used!

import sqlite3
conn = sqlite3.connect('example.db') 
cursor = conn.cursor()
user_id = 5  # Example safe input 
# Safe query using parameterized query 

cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", (user_id))

2. Server-side input/schema validation

Input validation can be effective in preventing SQLi. For example, if your API expects an email address or a credit card number, it’s easy to add validation for those cases.

3. Use SAST & DAST tools to discover SQLi

One of the most terrifying elements of SQLi is that it is easily discovered by adversaries often being described as a low-hanging fruit vulnerability. Part of this reason is because tools like DAST can automatically discover them. This can be used to our advantage and we can introduce these tools into our development process to catch them early.

Next-gen SAST tools like Aikido also allow you to autofix the issues right from within the platform.

4. Implement an in-app firewall

An in-app firewall monitors traffic and activity inside your application and can detect attacks including injection and SQLi. This is more effective than a traditional WAF as it sits inside your application and is able to tokenize expected queries and block requests that change the command structure of the query.

Shameless plug ;) for Aikido’s new launch: Zen, the in-app firewall for peace of mind at runtime. Get Zen and it will automatically block critical injection attacks and zero-day threats in real-time, before they ever reach your database.

5. Avoid Dynamic SQL Where Possible

Dynamic SQL generation through string concatenation is highly vulnerable to SQL injection. Whenever possible, stick to static, pre-defined queries and stored procedures that don’t rely on user-generated content for SQL structure.

6. Allowlisting and escaping

In some cases, you cannot avoid Dynamic SQL, such as when querying dynamic tables, or when you want to order by a user-defined column and direction. In those cases you have no other option than to rely on regular expression allowlisting or escaping. Escaping is taking user input that contains dangerous characters used in code like ‘>’ and turning them into a safe form. Ether by adding backslashes before them or transforming them into a symbol code. Note that this is different not only for each database type but can also depend on connection settings such as charset.

Will we ever see the end of SQLi?

While there is some promise in the fact we have seen a somewhat significant decrease in the number SQLi vulnerabilities found it is still disheartening to see that a vulnerability that predates the game DOOM is still such a significant threat to the landscape. The truth is, I can’t see this getting much better. As we introduce more tools to help us code faster, developers are getting less in touch with the core coding principles and these AI tools are notoriously bad at suggesting vulnerable code with injection vulnerabilities included.

It is not all Doom and gloom (pun intended) though, we are seeing significant improvements in a new generation of SAST tools that are far more effective at discovering and fixing these vulnerabilities has the ability to drastically change the threat landscape.

Signing off for now, don’t forget to:

Discover and automatically fix SQL injection with Aikido AI SAST Autofix

Checkout Zen and prevent injection attacks as they happen

Bonus: SQL History throughout history

Ever since we started talking about security in our applications we have talked about SQL injection. It was even featured at number 7 on the very first OWASP top 10 chart in 2003, in 2010 was included in the injection category and took the number 1 spot until 2021. One of the first large-scale attacks documented involving SQL injection was when the clothing company Guess was targeted resulting in the leak of credit card numbers. Since then SQL injection has been a regular guest among security headlines.

Bonus Pt 2 - Check out Injection Attacks 101 to get the an introduction to SQL injections, code injections, and XSS

"Aikido helps us catch the blind spots in our security that we couldn’t fully address with our existing tools. It’s been a game-changer for us beyond just the SCA (Software Composition Analysis) solutions we originally brought them in for."

A little while ago, we shared that Visma chose Aikido Security for its portfolio companies. Recently, we had the pleasure of having Nicolai Brogaard, Service Owner of SAST & SCA over in our Belgian headquarters.

Nikolai’s part of the security testing team at Visma, a large conglomerate with 180 portfolio companies. Visma is serious about security—it's something they focus on across the board. With 15,000 employees (6,000 of whom are developers) and a dedicated security team of 100 people, security is at the core of their operations.

These are his thoughts on the evolving security landscape, and the role Aikido plays in it.

Why Aikido?

At Visma, we’ve thought about building our own security tools, but we realized pretty quickly it wasn’t the best use of our resources. That’s where Aikido came in. They filled in the gaps that our existing tools, especially SAST (Static Application Security Testing), didn’t cover. With Aikido, we didn’t have to stretch ourselves thin developing tools from scratch.

Regional Expertise Matters

Being based in the EU, it’s really important for us to work with vendors who understand the specific regulations we face—especially things like GDPR and data residency requirements. Aikido gets this. They know the ins and outs of EU regulations, which makes it much easier for us to comply with things like keeping data on national soil.

How We Evaluate Security Software

When we look at new vendors, we go by the 80/20 rule: If a solution fits the needs of 80% of our portfolio companies, it’s worth considering. Aikido nailed that for us. Beyond just SCA, they provide additional features, like addressing security blind spots and helping with CSPM (Cloud Security Posture Management). These added benefits really sealed the deal for us.

The Benefits of Aikido

Aikido hasn’t just enhanced our security posture—it’s also helped us uncover things we were missing with our previous tools. Initially, we brought them on for SCA, but we quickly realized they could do much more, especially in reducing the time and effort spent on dealing with false positives. Their auto-remediation feature is a huge time-saver for our teams. It cuts through the noise, so our developers can focus on what really matters.

Smooth Transition

Switching to Aikido was easy. At Visma, we have an internal security developer portal called Hubble, which makes onboarding new tools super straightforward. With Aikido, it was just a matter of integrating them into Hubble and giving our portfolio companies a gentle nudge to make the switch. Most companies transitioned quickly, and the rest follow over time as we track risk internally.

What Visma Loves About Aikido

The best thing about Aikido? They’re super proactive. We have a shared Slack channel with them, and they’re always quick to respond and solve any issues our teams run into. It’s great to feel like we’re more than just a customer—they really care about making sure we’re getting the most out of their product.

"Aikido isn’t just a vendor for us—they’re a true partner. Their responsiveness and dedication to helping us succeed make all the difference."

Key Highlights:

• Filling Security Gaps: Aikido shines a light on the blind spots our other tools miss.
• Time-Saving Automation: The auto-remediation feature cuts down on noise, letting our developers focus on real issues.
• Simple Onboarding: With Visma’s internal portal, getting companies on board with Aikido is a breeze.
• Proactive Support: Aikido’s fast, responsive support via instant messaging platforms (like Slack) makes us feel like we’re in good hands.

Hey Dan! Can you tell us a bit more about yourself and Bound?

Hi, I’m Dan Kindler and I’m the CTO and co-founder of Bound. We focus on making currency conversion and hedging cheap, fair, and most of all, easy. Our platforms help hundreds of businesses protect themselves from currency risk across the world. Currently, about half of our team is composed of engineers.

How is Bound positioned within the FinTech sector, and compared to the competition?

Before diving into FinTech itself, let me cover how we’re positioned against traditional financial institutions first. Traditional banks or brokers typically cater to customers with large treasury teams who value dealing over the phone and email. Their online exchanges typically only offer on-the-spot transactions. Since our aim is to make hedging easy and hassle-free, we’re offering both spot and currency hedging tools to manage and protect your international cash flows. Back in December 2022, we received our FCA authorization, a UK financial regulatory authority, allowing us to provide regulated hedging products.

When it comes to FinTech, it's safe to say we’re breaking Bound-aries (yeah) by introducing self-serve foreign exchange conversions online. Companies like Wise and Revolut have done a tremendous job of making currency conversions easy online – but they only focus on “spot” (or instant) conversions. With Bound, we focus on future cash flows, which they don’t focus as much on.

What purpose should security in FinTech serve?

Security plays a huge role in our industry. At the end of the day, we're dealing with financial transactions that could be worth hundreds of thousands of pounds/dollars/euros – if not more. At Bound, our transaction volume already exceeded hundreds of millions of dollars. If a security risk sneaks its way into our product - or any FinTech product for that matter - it's safe to say sh*'t hits the fan. And not just any fan. Legal consequences aside, hackers could steal other people’s savings, destroying businesses and lives.

Within FinTech, we can imagine regulatory instances or governmental regulatory bodies are putting more scrutiny on companies that deal with customer data. How does Aikido help you deal with this?

The pressure to stay compliant is huge. In the UK, we’re constantly navigating strict regulations like the GDPR and the FCA's guidance on data protection and security. The regulators expect us to be proactive in managing vulnerabilities, especially since we handle sensitive customer data.

Aikido has been a game-changer for us. The 9-in-1 platform allows us to comprehensively cover every aspect of our software security. This approach makes it easier to meet regulatory requirements without piecing together multiple tools. A big plus has been the false-positive reduction. In a regulatory landscape, we don’t have the luxury of wasting time chasing down non-existent vulnerabilities. Aikido’s precision means that when an alert comes in, we can trust it’s something that requires action, which is invaluable during audits or compliance reviews. Plus, the clear UX allows our team to act swiftly, avoiding the complexity that usually comes with security tools. It ensures that we stay ahead of any potential compliance issues without disrupting our development flow.

What future regulation do you see coming down the line for other engineering leads & VPs to keep an eye on?

Future UK FinTech regulations are likely to focus on expanding Open Banking and enhancing digital assets oversight. With innovations like Variable Recurring Payments and a digital regulatory sandbox, engineering teams should prepare for tighter security standards and new API integrations.

Before Aikido, what kept you up at night in terms of security? How were you addressing security?

Honestly, it was a mess trying to manage different tools for each type of security check. We were constantly worried something would get missed, and the number of false positives made it even worse. Aikido brought everything together in one place, so now we’re catching real issues without all the noise, and it’s made our lives way easier.

We saw Bound is one of our few customers that pretty much solved every open issue reported. Has Aikido helped you out with this?

Absolutely! We pride ourselves on taking security very seriously (as most companies – hopefully – do). For us, Aikido has had a tremendous impact on how we approach vulnerability management and remediation. We consider it to be our single source of truth, and the platform’s deduplication & pre-filtering of false positives features really help us see the forest through the trees. Once a real vulnerability pops up, we have a trigger appear in our issue tracker (Linear) to ensure we fix it as soon as possible. The process is pretty neat and well embedded into our development cycle, and we rely on it a lot.

What's your experience in working together with the Aikido team?

The team’s been super responsive and supportive from day 1. We’re able to share real time feedback, make requests, and receive relevant product updates through our joint Slack channel. At some point, I asked the Aikido team if they knew what they’ve gotten themselves into. We didn’t let their product team sleep once we realized we could ask all the things!

What's your favorite feature?

False-positive reduction aside, the ‘Import from GitHub’-button is very cool. I really like that all the repos automatically get assigned to a team. We can keep GitHub as the source of truth, while Aikido seamlessly maps everything out accordingly.

Any closing remarks?

We had our first penetration test and Amazon AWS security audit earlier this year, which went very well. We got nothing above a medium (and most of the mediums I didn’t entirely agree with anyway…). They probably would have found much more of interest if we hadn’t had Aikido shouting at us constantly, so thanks for that!

TL;DR We’ve partnered with SprintoGRC, the full-stack security compliance automation platform, to help companies put security on autopilot. Get compliance done 🤝 get back to building.

How do you get compliant without imposing a heavy workload on your dev team? Or better yet, how do you get compliant fast?

Be it ISO 27001, SOC 2, or [insert yet another compliance framework here], gaining and maintaining compliance is a daunting task. But it doesn’t have to be.

With the right tools and support, you can put compliance on autopilot.

That’s why we are excited to kick-off a new partnership with SprintoGRC, a full-stack security compliance automation platform built for growing tech companies.

Sprinto helps companies ‘move fast without breaking things’ in the process of becoming compliant and completing security audits quickly, through continuous control monitoring, automated workflows, and evidence collection. Sprinto helps mid-market companies to stay SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS compliant, in addition to 15 more common frameworks.

To achieve SOC 2, ISO 27001, and most compliance standards, companies need to implement technical vulnerability management measures.

If you’re new here, technical vulnerabilities are areas of weakness in your source code or infrastructure that attackers could potentially exploit. If companies don’t take measures to the right address and protect themselves against attacks…it's likely they will not achieve compliance.

So what is technical vulnerability management? It’s a fancy term that boils down to: identifying, prioritizing, and addressing vulnerabilities in your codebase and infrastructure.

This can be a very tedious process that creates a lot of undue work for developers. Developers have to conduct a security risk assessment, prioritize all of the identified technical vulnerabilities, then go through and fix those vulnerabilities through implementing patches, upgrading softwares, and making configuration changes. This takes hours and hours of sorting through alerts, finding the needle in the haystack, decrypting foreign security jargon.

On top of that, developers are required to check the effectiveness of the security measures through testing - including pen testing - and continuously monitoring their entire code and cloud setup for vulnerabilities from that day forward.

Enter: Aikido. With our platform, companies can automate their technical vulnerability management; skip the hours of drudge, automatically generate their risk assessment, find and fix what matters, and put technical compliance on autopilot.

Companies who use SprintoGRC to sprint through their compliance and audit can plug Aikido in directly. All of the checks and evidence that Aikido generates gets uploaded directly to Sprinto, accelerating compliance.

Using SprintoGRC + Aikido together means you can get compliance done faster - and cheaper. And who doesn’t love saving time and money?

Learn more about Sprinto here. Set up the Sprinto x Aikido integration here.

So, you’re looking for SAST and DAST. Or, you’re looking to understand what SAST and DAST tools are: What are the key differences? How do you use them together? Do you need them?

You’re in the right place. Let’s dive in.

But first, the TL;DR:

• TL;DR: SAST checks your code for vulnerabilities before your app runs, while DAST tests your app while it’s running to find issues that pop up in real time.
• SAST is like an expert dev reviewing your code, DAST is like a hacker trying to break in.
• Using both together helps catch security problems from start to deployment, and ensures your app is safe.
• Shameless plug 😇 - if you’re looking for SAST & DAST, check us out. Get your SAST & DAST covered, so you can get back to building.
  

SAST & DAST: What you need to know

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) are two essential methods in application security that help identify vulnerabilities in software.

What is SAST?

SAST, or Static Application Security Testing, is a testing method that analyzes an application's source code in a static or non-running state. It is a “white-box” testing technique.

SAST allows developers to identify vulnerabilities early in the development (SDLC) process, like code development or code review phases. SAST tools are easy to integrate into CI/CD pipelines and IDEs, so you can secure your code as it's written and scan your code before committing changes to the repository.

SAST can detect vulnerabilities like SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), hard-coded credentials, and other OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities. SAST tools, like Aikido SAST, scan and compare your code to databases of known security vulnerabilities like the National Vulnerability Database (NVD).

Think of it like this, SAST is like having an expert review your code with a fine tooth comb, who gives you immediate feedback on issues they discover.

That being said, SAST is limited and cannot be used to detect runtime or environment specific vulnerabilities, like configuration errors or runtime dependencies. Scanning code requires that you choose a SAST tool that supports your programming language.

Why does SAST matter?

This early detection is crucial as it allows developers to address issues before the application is deployed, making it easier and less costly to fix problems early. SAST is proactive security, it can save a lot of time - and headache - for the future.

What is DAST?

DAST, or Dynamic Application Security Testing, is a testing method that evaluates an application while it is running.

While SAST sees inside your source code, DAST does not require source code access. Instead, DAST takes an outsider approach to testing your applications security.

DAST simulates attacks on the application much like a hacker would. It is a “black-box” technique.

DAST can also be called “surface monitoring” as it tests the surface or front-end of the web app. DAST tools interact with the application via the user interface, testing various inputs and observing the outputs to identify vulnerabilities such as authentication issues, server misconfigurations, and other runtime vulnerabilities. As DAST works at runtime, that means you need a working application before DAST tests make sense, which is usually around the pre-production and production phase.

Because DAST works externally - and uses standardized protocols like HTTP to connect to your app - DAST is not tied to a specific programming language, unlike SAST.

Why does DAST matter?

This method is important for detecting issues that you cannot detect before deployment. DAST covers you for different categories of errors. DAST identifies risks that come up when the application is up and running, like server or database misconfigurations, authentication and encryption issues that allow unauthorized access, or risks from web services that your application connects to.

Using SAST and DAST Together

Using SAST and DAST together is recommended. Combining SAST and DAST gives you broad coverage across the software development lifecycle. Cover yourself early with SAST and ensure you have real-world resilience later with DAST. This combination allows teams to address vulnerabilities at multiple stages and ultimately leads to more secure applications.

Cheatsheet: SAST vs DAST

Testing Approach:

• SAST: White-box (inside-out) testing. It does not require a running application, working “like an expert developer.”
• DAST: Black-box (outside-in) testing. It requires a running application, testing “like a hacker.”

Access to Code:

• SAST: Requires access to the source code.
• DAST: No access to the source code is required.

When to Use in Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC):

• SAST: Used early in the SDLC. Integrate into your CI/CD and IDE to secure code as it is written.
• DAST: Used later in the SDLC, starting in the pre-production and production phase.

Type of Vulnerabilities Detected:

• SAST: Detects security issues in source code, such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and hard-coded credentials.
• DAST: Detects runtime and environment-related vulnerabilities, such as misconfigurations.

Key Advantages:

• SAST: Identifies vulnerabilities early, allowing for easier remediation that saves time and money.
• DAST: Tests application behavior as a real attacker would, covering a broader attack surface, catching different categories of errors (like configuration issues), and producing low false positives.

Key Limitations:

• SAST: Language and platform-dependent, may produce false positives, and cannot discover runtime or environment-related issues.
• DAST: Cannot pinpoint the exact source of vulnerabilities, requires a running application, and vulnerabilities are more expensive to fix at this stage.

Popular Open Source Tools:

• SAST: Semgrep, Bandit, Gosec.
• DAST: ZAP, Nuclei.

Snyk is widely recognized as one of the top security tools for developers, especially when it comes to finding vulnerabilities in open-source code, containers, and infrastructure as code. However, no tool is perfect for every scenario and access to the Snyk platform comes with a price tag. Depending on your needs, there may be Snyk alternatives that provide better integration, features, or just better value for money.

Here, we'll look at 5 Snyk alternatives and why they might be a better fit for your organization.

1. Aikido Security

• Why It’s Better: all-in-one appsec
• Overview: Aikido integrates open-source scanners into a 10-in-1 vulnerability management platform, delivering exceptional value with affordable pricing tiers.
• Advantages:
• Strong focus on noise reduction
• 10-in-1 vulnerability scanners
• Continuous scanning throughout the entire development lifecycle
• In-depth policy enforcement capabilities
• Why It Might Be Better than Snyk:
• While Snyk provides a good base of powerful security scanners, Aikido is superior for organizations that need all-around vulnerability protection, license tracking, and compliance features, especially in highly regulated industries - and all that affordably priced.

2. Dependabot

• Why It’s Better: Seamless Integration with GitHub
• Overview: Acquired by GitHub, Dependabot offers automatic dependency updates for your projects. It continuously monitors your dependencies for vulnerabilities and automatically generates pull requests with updates.
• Advantages:
• Native integration with GitHub repositories
• Automated pull requests and patches with minimal configuration
• Simple, lightweight, and easy to use
• Free for public and private repositories on GitHub
• Why It Might Be Better:
• If your codebase is hosted on GitHub, Dependabot’s native integration makes it a natural choice. It’s also fully automated, which means less manual work compared to Snyk’s more interactive approach.

3. SonarQube

• Why It’s Better: Code Quality Meets Security
• Overview: SonarQube is a code quality and security tool that scans codebases for both code smells and security vulnerabilities, making it a great option for developers looking for a tool that blends security with code health.
• Advantages:
• Combines code quality checks with security scanning
• Broad language support and community-driven plugins
• Integrates with popular CI/CD tools and DevOps pipelines
• Detailed reports on both technical debt and vulnerabilities
• Why It Might Be Better:
• Suppose you are looking for a tool that goes beyond just security vulnerabilities and provides insights into code quality. In that case, SonarQube’s ability to highlight maintainability and performance issues is a big plus.

4. Clair

• Why It’s Better: Container Security Focus
• Overview: Clair is an open-source vulnerability scanner primarily focused on Docker and OCI container images. It integrates directly into your container pipelines, analyzing vulnerabilities in images.
• Advantages:
• Strong focus on container security, especially for Kubernetes environments
• Seamless integration with container registries like Docker Hub and Quay.io
• Open-source, allowing for customization and integration with other tools
• Continuous scanning for known vulnerabilities
• Why It Might Be Better:
• While Snyk covers container security, Clair’s exclusive focus on containers allows it to offer a more fine-tuned and granular approach. For organizations deeply invested in containerized environments, Clair may provide better visibility and customization options.

5. Aqua Security

• Why It’s Better: End-to-End Cloud Native Security
• Overview: Aqua Security provides a holistic solution for securing containers, serverless functions, and other cloud-native applications. It covers a wide range of security needs, from image scanning to runtime protection.
• Advantages:
• End-to-end security solution for containers, serverless, and Kubernetes
• Strong runtime protection capabilities
• Real-time threat detection and anomaly monitoring
• Integrates with CI/CD pipelines and multiple cloud platforms
• Why It Might Be Better:
• Aqua’s depth in cloud-native security, especially its real-time threat detection and runtime protection, makes it a more powerful solution for cloud-native environments compared to Snyk, which is more focused on scanning and remediation during the development phase.

Conclusion

Snyk is a powerful tool, but these alternatives may offer better solutions depending on your specific needs. Aikido provides superior value for money with an all-in-one platform, Dependabot excels at GitHub integration and automation, SonarQube enhances code quality while ensuring security, Clair specializes in container security, and Aqua Security delivers comprehensive cloud-native security. Ultimately, the best tool for your organization will depend on your existing workflows, the complexity of your infrastructure, and the specific challenges you’re trying to solve.